Our firm is located in the metro Houston area and we’re experiencing a major weather event, so if it takes us an extra day to contact you, apologies in advance.

Close this search box.

Missouri Supreme Court Denies Review of $2.11 Billion Talc-Ovarian Cancer Ruling

The Supreme Court of the State of Missouri has denied an effort by Johnson & Johnson’s legal counsel to seek reconsideration of a state appellate court’s recent opinion that upheld $2.11 billion in punitive and compensatory damages against the company and its affiliate in claims that the company’s iconic talc-based baby powder caused the ovarian cancer of almost two dozen plaintiffs. 


“The trial jury sent a loud message alerting the world to the dangers of talc. Now that message has been confirmed through each level of the state’s appellate system,”


said Mark Lanier, founder of The Lanier Law Firm and counsel for the plaintiffs in the July 2018 trial. “While we applaud J&J’s decision to cease distributing its talc-based powders in North America, much more needs to be done to provide justice for victims both now, and in the future.”

“The appellate court carefully considered the instructions and verdict rendered at the trial court, and the resulting opinion presented a fair and reasonable resolution of the claims,” said the firm’s Kevin Parker. “Based on this decision it is clear the Johnson & Johnson should accept the findings of the jury and the appellate court and move forward with proper compensation to the victims of their baby powder products.”

In late June of this year the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District found that J&J engaged in “reprehensible conduct” by manufacturing and selling asbestos-containing talcum powder products over the course of many decades.  While reducing the $4.69 billion in damages awarded by the trial court jury, and disallowing damages to two of the 22 plaintiffs on jurisdictional grounds, the court stated that The Lanier Law Firm trial team “proved with convincing clarity that Defendants engaged in outrageous conduct because of an evil motive or reckless indifference.”

The plaintiffs were represented in the appellate process by Kevin Parker of the Lanier Law Firm, assisted on the brief by Mark Lanier, Ken Starr, Natalie Armour, Benjamin Major, and Megan Waida. 

Co-counsel included Eric Holland and Patrick Dowd of Holland Law Firm LLC, and John Torbitzky of Behr McCarter & Potter PC.