Toxic Torts Attorneys and Environmental Contamination Litigation

Environmental law protects the public from harm through regulations that preserve natural resources and prevent pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the primary regulatory authority that monitors and enforces environmental policy. It includes oversight of the following:

  • Air quality
  • Water quality
  • Waste management and disposal
  • Toxic substances
  • Pesticides
  • Land and cleanup
  • Environmental emergencies

Violations of this policy can result in serious harm to the general public. Unfortunately, large companies frequently disregard public policy in favor of their own profitability.

Alex Brown, managing attorney of The Lanier Law Firm’s commercial litigation section, comments, “The civil servants at the EPA are often understaffed and overwhelmed. It has been our experience that companies take advantage of this and count on the fact that they will simply be overlooked by the EPA.

“Thankfully, our justice system permits law firms like ours to bring lawsuits to hold polluters accountable, even if they have evaded consequences for their actions from the EPA or other regulators.”

The Lanier Law Firm is a Leading Toxic Tort Law Firm

The Lanier Law Firm has held large companies accountable for harming individuals for more than 30 years. These large companies used to think they could get away with illegal and injurious conduct due to their vast financial resources, but our law firm has taught them that they can no longer hide the truth behind their wealth.

Detailed Preparation

Our law firm performs thorough investigations into all our cases, utilizing private investigators when necessary to dig up public and private documents that bring out the truth in a manner that will satisfy the standards of evidence in a court of law.

Proven Litigation Skills

We are skilled litigators with a national reputation for courtroom success that has won our law firm the prestigious designation of Most Feared Plaintiffs’ Firms by Law360. Our reputation increases the likelihood that our clients will be offered a fair and reasonable settlement. If not, our clients can be confident that our law firm knows how to win in court.

Our Approach to Legal Care

Our work ethic and compassion for our clients play an essential role in our cases. We spend significant time with each client so we can understand the extent of their losses. We genuinely care for each client and pursue fair compensation in every case.

Our Results

Our approach to legal care has helped us attain remarkable results against large companies that harmed our clients. Below are a few examples of how we achieved successful outcomes for cases involving toxic substances:

  • $4.69 billion verdict against Johnson & Johnson on behalf of 22 women in the first case linking asbestos in baby powder to ovarian cancer, which was upheld on appeal with a final total of $2.1 billion
  • $115 million verdict secured by our highly-experienced mesothelioma lawyers on behalf of 21 steelworkers in Alabama who contracted an asbestos-related disease on the job
  • A successful verdict against an industrial manufacturer on behalf of a retired pipefitter who contracted mesothelioma after using asbestos-laden products

Making a Difference

Our firm takes pride in making a difference in our clients’ lives by standing up to large companies on their behalf. Our goal is to help our clients access quality medical care and restore their lives to the fullest extent possible.

We are also proud of our role in reshaping business-as-usual so that these companies will stop harming the public. According to Brown:

“Holding polluters accountable by making them pay to clean up their mess and compensate the victims does have a positive impact on their environmental policies going forward. These companies think in terms of dollars and cents, so when a jury hits them with a big verdict for the damages they have caused, they are forced to consider improving the way they operate.”

Call 800-723-3216 now to see if our personal injury law firm can pursue compensation for you and your family. Consultations are free.

Our Active Environmental Cases

The Lanier Law Firm is active in numerous environmental litigation matters, and we accept clients throughout the United States who have been harmed by environmental contamination.

Union Pacific

“While Union Pacific is paying a small price to clean up its own property, thousands of people have paid the price for decades of neglect, cover-ups and corporate disregard for basic health and safety,” says Mark Lanier of the Lanier Law Firm, part of the legal team bringing the claims against Union Pacific. “The company knew or should have known that dumping its hazardous waste was going to damage their own property and affect others nearby, but Union Pacific simply didn’t care.”

“Because this pollution has been hidden for so long, it’s difficult to estimate the number of people potentially affected at this time,” says the Lanier Law Firm’s Ryan Ellis. “It’s likely there are residents who have lived in this neighborhood and raised children and grandchildren while these chemicals were seeping onto their properties. We won’t know the true extent of the problems until we have conducted discovery as part of the legal process.”

Franklin, Indiana Water Contamination

In 2019, the EPA publicly announced that toxic chemicals had been dumped in the Franklin, Indiana, community for decades without the public’s knowledge. These chemicals impacted the environment, groundwater, and sewer system, causing devastating illnesses.

Our law firm is involved in a class action lawsuit against the large companies that are responsible for this contamination:

  • Honeywell International, Inc.
  • Amphenol Corporation
  • BorgWarner, Inc.
  • 400 Forsythe, Inc.
  • Indiana-American Water Company

The predecessor companies for Honeywell International, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation, which operated the site when the toxic chemicals were released into the community, are also named defendants in the case.

Brown states, “The team led by The Lanier Law Firm has uncovered troves of documents through the discovery process, some dating back decades, which confirm the existence and extent of the toxic contamination from the site in Franklin. Documents also indicate that the defendants tried to keep the contamination a secret from homeowners to avoid bad publicity and lawsuits.”

The plaintiffs in our class action lawsuit are a group of homeowners whose properties were contaminated by carcinogenic chemicals. “By bringing this suit, The Lanier Law Firm seeks to hold the polluters accountable, force them to remediate the properties they have contaminated and pay compensation to homeowners whose home values have been decimated,” Brown comments.

We are also representing plaintiffs outside the class action lawsuit. These are families who have had children die of cancer or family members battle cancer that they developed from the contamination.

Los Angeles Contaminated Groundwater in Canoga Park and Winnetka

Litton Industries was the nation’s largest surface combat ship manufacturer and a supplier of military electronics and information systems until December 2000, when Northrop Grumman agreed to purchase the company. Northrop Grumman is a large aerospace company and defense contractor.

Litton Industries disposed of carcinogenic chemicals improperly, resulting in groundwater contamination beneath Canoga Park and Winnetka. The contaminating chemicals include trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE).

According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), exposure to TCE and PCE has been linked to numerous health issues, including:

  • Various cancers
  • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Leukemia
  • End-stage renal disease
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Congenital disabilities
  • Miscarriage
  • Impaired immune system function
  • Neurological effects

The innocent people living, working, and raising families in this community have experienced irreparable harm through no fault of their own, and they should not have to bear the costs of these injuries. Our firm is dedicated to holding this company accountable.

Radioactive Waste in Central Florida

The Lanier Law Firm is the lead counsel in the case against the Mosaic Mining Company and two real estate developers. The entities failed to disclose to homebuyers that the properties they were purchasing were located in areas contaminated with radioactive waste as a byproduct of phosphate mining operations.

Health effects from exposure to these radioactive materials include the following:

  • Lung cancer
  • Lymphoma
  • Bone cancer
  • Leukemia

In May of 2025, there is a bill pending in the Florida House that would provide protections for Mosaic and companies like it that do phosphate mining in the state.

Contamination of Land in Florida

In 2017, residents of the Grassland and Oakbridge communities in Lakeland, Florida, filed a lawsuit against Drummond Co. for not disclosing the radiation risks from having their properties built on reclaimed phosphate-mined land. The Drummond Co. bought the land in 1978 and mined it until 1982, when they decided to develop it for housing instead.

The lawsuit alleges that Drummond Co. knew as early as 1978 that the land was composed of radioactive and hazardous substances that could threaten the community, but it made minimal efforts to disclose this information and still chose to develop.

Smelter Fallout in Carteret, New Jersey

In 2016, Carteret, New Jersey residents discovered their air and soil were contaminated with numerous toxic materials, such as arsenic, lead, selenium, and zinc.

In September 2023, The Lanier Law Firm won a $42 million settlement in this environmental pollution case against U.S. Metals Refining Company, its parent company Freeport-McMoRan Inc., and Amax Realty Development Inc. About a thousand Carteret property owners will receive compensation for the harm caused by the toxic materials.

This contamination occurred due to the companies’ mishandling of the toxic smelting byproducts emitted from their smokestack. As early as 2009, a judge noted U.S. Metal’s poor contamination controls, yet the company delayed testing and notifying homeowners for seven years.

According to the EPA, prolonged exposure to these chemicals has been linked to the following health effects:

  • Damage to the immune system
  • Neurological damage
  • Reproductive effects
  • Developmental issues
  • Respiratory issues
  • Irritation of the skin and mucous membranes
  • Lung cancer
  • Kidney damage

U.S. Metals Refining Company has already agreed to participate in cleanup efforts, but it falls short of compensating the homeowners who were wrongfully exposed to these health hazards without their knowledge and through no fault of their own.

Camp LeJeune Water Contamination

Military personnel and their families who lived at Camp Lejeune and employees who worked at the base camp between August 1953 and December 1987 were subjected to high levels of toxic substances in their drinking water without their knowledge.

As a result of the water contamination at Camp LeJeune, victims have experienced the following devastating health effects:

  • Several types of cancer
  • Severe congenital disabilities
  • Childhood leukemia
  • Miscarriage
  • Premature death, including the death of children
  • Neurological impairments
  • Organ damage

Due to the North Carolina 10-year statute of repose, victims could not file a civil action for damages because the contamination was not made known until after the statute of repose had expired. This was finally remedied with the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022, which replaced the statute of repose with a two-year statute of limitations from the date the act became law.

Filing a Camp Lejeune water contamination lawsuit is complicated. Contact our environmental attorneys to see if you are eligible.

Crystalline Silica Dust Exposure Litigation

The Lanier Law Firm represents individuals diagnosed with silicosis, a serious lung disease caused by occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Our legal team is familiar with the regulatory landscape surrounding silica dust exposure and the industries most affected, including artificial stone fabrication and construction. We assist clients in navigating the silicosis claims process and understanding their legal options under current workplace safety standards.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

How Much Compensation Is Available for My Environmental Case?

The amount of compensation available varies based on your jurisdiction, type of case, facts of your case, and severity of your injuries. In addition to harming the planet, environmental pollution causes several kinds of damage to individuals and families, including the following:

  • Severe long-term health effects
  • Miscarriages and congenital disabilities
  • Premature death
  • Reduced property values
  • The inability of homeowners to freely enjoy their homes
  • Emotional anguish

If you have suffered any of these effects, you may be eligible for substantial compensation, including economic, non-economic, and punitive damages.

Economic Damages

Economic damages are the documented monetary losses you have suffered as a result of environmental contamination. This could include the following:

  • Medical expenses for you and your family
  • Lost wages as a result of your injuries
  • Moving or lodging costs stemming from the contamination
  • Loss of property value stemming from the pollution or contamination

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages are the subjective damages related to the injury’s effect on your quality of life. These damages may include the following:

  • Pain and suffering
  • Loss of normal life
  • Loss of society
  • Loss of consortium

Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are not always available. When available, they are considered non-compensatory damages only awarded in cases where the injurious conduct has been proven grossly negligent, blatantly reckless, deliberate, or fraudulent. The purpose is to punish and deter the defendant from engaging in similar behavior in the future.

Injunctive Relief

Injunctive relief, also known as an injunction, is a non-monetary remedy in which a party is ordered to stop engaging in an activity or required to act a certain way. Examples of injunctions in environmental law include the following:

  • Ordering a polluter to stop activities that are causing the pollution
  • Ordering a polluter to perform cleanup on a contaminated site

Compensation in Class Action Cases

Compensation awarded in class action cases is awarded to the class and split between the members.

What if My Loved One Passed Away Because of Environmental Contamination?

In the tragic loss of a loved one due to environmental contamination, the estate or family of the deceased has the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit. It provides similar compensation, with the potential for the following:

  • Funeral and burial expenses
  • Pecuniary losses, such as income the deceased would have earned had they survived
  • Loss of guidance, companionship, or other relationship benefits
  • Pain and suffering of the deceased
  • Some jurisdictions allow compensation for grief or pain and suffering of the family

Proceeds in a wrongful death lawsuit are awarded to the estate and divided among the family members as specified by state law.

When Should I Contact an Environmental Contamination Attorney?

Every jurisdiction has deadlines for when cases can be filed, called the statute of limitations. In some jurisdictions, this is as short as one year.

An effective environmental attorney invests significant time and resources to investigate and prepare a case before filing. For this reason, it is imperative that you contact an attorney as soon as possible to allow time to prepare the most robust case.

Photo of Alex Brown

How Much Does It Cost To Hire an Environmental Attorney?

The Lanier Law Firm offers a contingency fee agreement, which means you pay nothing upfront. After we recover compensation for you, you pay us a percentage of the recovery, which will be fully disclosed to you. If we fail to win, you pay nothing.

Headshot of Alex Brown, Managing Attorney for the Lanier Law Firm Business Litigation practice.
Alex Brown
Managing Attorney, Business Litigation

Alex Brown is dedicated to business litigation, handling complex disputes in federal, state, and international forums. He led trial teams to secure a $9 billion jury award in the Actos case. Recent honors include Best Lawyers (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2025), among others.

Contact Our Firm

Schedule a FREE Consultation or Call
800-723-3216

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
First Name(Required)
Last Name(Required)

How Can the Lanier Law Firm Help With My Environmental Case?

Headshot of Lawrence P. Wilson, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury and product liability.
Lawrence P. Wilson

leer más

Abogado Senior
Lawrence P. Wilson se dedica a lesiones personales, responsabilidad por productos, negligencia médica y ciertos asuntos marítimos. Casos notables: $17.5 millones por lesiones personales y veredicto favorable en Schwab v. Ford Motor Company. Reconocido como Texas Super Lawyer (2012-2021) y en Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Lawyers.

Headshot of Alex Abston, Senior Attorney in Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability.
Alex Abston

leer más

Abogada
Alex Abston se dedica a responsabilidad farmacéutica, por productos y demandas colectivas. Formó parte del equipo que obtuvo uno de los primeros veredictos federales en MDL 2804, In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation. Honores incluyen Lawdragon 500 Next Generation (2024) y los 40 mejores de Texas menores de 40 (2021-2024).

Headshot of Alex Brown, Managing Attorney for the Lanier Law Firm Business Litigation practice.
Alex Brown

leer más

Abogado Gerente, Litigios Comerciales
Alex Brown se dedica a litigios comerciales, manejando disputas complejas en tribunales federales, estatales e internacionales. Lideró equipos de juicio para asegurar un veredicto de $9 mil millones en el caso Actos. Honores recientes incluyen Best Lawyers (2024-2025) y Lawdragon 500 (2025), entre otros.

Headshot of attorney Benjamin T. Major from the Lanier Law Firm's Issues and Appeals legal team.
Benjamin T. Major

leer más

Abogado
Benjamin T. Major se dedica a apelaciones, ayudando a preservar sentencias multimillonarias y asegurar acuerdos favorables. Logros notables incluyen preservar una sentencia por cáncer de ovario y derrotar mociones en litigios antimonopolio y de reclamaciones falsas. Reconocido como Texas Rising Star (2018-2020), entre otros logros.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Case A. Dam, part of the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Case A. Dam

leer más

Abogado Senior
Case A. Dam se dedica a exposición al asbesto, representando a clientes con mesotelioma, asbestosis y cánceres relacionados. Ha servido a veteranos, mecánicos automotrices y trabajadores de diversas industrias. Reconocido en el Lawdragon 500 de Abogados de Demandantes Líderes (2024), entre otros logros.

Headshot of Darron E. Berquist, Managing Attorney Asbestos Litigation for the Lanier Law Firm.
Darron E. Berquist

leer más

Abogado Gerente, Litigios por Asbesto
Darron se dedica a exposición al asbesto y responsabilidad por productos. Parte del equipo que obtuvo $4.69 mil millones en Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, vinculando el asbesto en talco con el cáncer de ovario. Honorado por Best Lawyers por Litigios por Responsabilidad por Productos y Mass Tort (2024-2025).

Headshot of David L. Rosenband, Senior Attorney practicing Personal Injury and Pharmaceutical and Product Liability.
David L. Rosenband

leer más

Abogado Senior
David L. Rosenband se dedica a responsabilidad farmacéutica, lesiones personales y responsabilidad por productos. Fue Abogado de Enlace en la litigación de Bextra/Celebrex en Nueva York y ayudó a asegurar un veredicto de $9 millones en el caso Accutane de NJ. Reconocido por su trabajo en litigios MDL y en tribunales estatales.

Headshot of Evan M. Janush, Managing Attorney, New York, for Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical Liability, and Product Liability.
Evan M. Janush

leer más

Abogado Gerente, Nueva York
Evan M. Janush supervisa los litigios por responsabilidad farmacéutica y de productos en litigios masivos en NY. Formó parte del Comité Ejecutivo de Demandantes en MDL 2804 y del equipo de juicio en los casos Vioxx. Reconocido por Best Lawyers en Litigios por Daños Masivos/Demandas Colectivas (2024-2025) y Lawdragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Judson A. Waltman is a Lanier Law Firm Managing Attorney for product liability, personal injury and maritime law.
Judson A. Waltman

leer más

Abogado Gerente
Judson A. Waltman se dedica a lesiones personales, responsabilidad por productos y derecho marítimo. Obtuvo uno de los veredictos más grandes en Ward County, Texas, para un trabajador de campo petrolero y un veredicto de $2 millones para un trabajador de Texas Central. Reconocido por Best Lawyers (2024-2025).

Abogado Senior
Kevin LaMarca se dedica a exposición al asbesto, lesiones personales y responsabilidad por productos. Obtuvo acuerdos de siete cifras, incluyendo $2.25 millones para la familia de un trabajador de papelería fallecido. Reconocido como Top 40 Under 40 de National Trial Lawyers, representa clientes en tribunales estatales y federales.

Abogado Senior
Manny Cabrera se dedica a exposición al asbesto y casos de lesiones catastróficas. Ha representado a clientes en asuntos relacionados con el asbesto, lesiones personales, así como en casos de responsabilidad por camiones y propiedades. Honrado como Top 40 Under 40 de National Trial Lawyers en Litigios Civiles para Demandantes.

Headshot of Maura Kolb, Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution in the mesothelioma and pharmaceutical liability practice.
Maura Kolb

leer más

Abogada Gerente, Resolución de Asbesto
Maura Kolb lidera el equipo de resolución de asbesto, asegurando millones para los clientes. Parte del equipo que ganó $258 millones en el caso Vioxx y coordinado acuerdos por el derrame de petróleo de BP en el Golfo. Reconocida por Lawdragon 500 (2024).

Headshot of Megan Waida, Senior Attorney in the Lanier Law Firm's Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Megan Waida

leer más

Abogada Senior
Megan Waida se dedica a exposición al asbesto y casos de apelación. Nombrada a Top 40 Under 40 de National Trial Lawyers (2018-2021), Megan aboga por las víctimas del asbesto y tiene una sólida experiencia en litigios complejos.

Headshot of Michael A. Akselrud, Senior Attorney in our Business Litigation, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Michael A. Akselrud

leer más

Abogado Senior
Michael A. Akselrud se dedica a lesiones personales, litigios comerciales y responsabilidad por productos. Parte del equipo de juicio que obtuvo un veredicto de $4.69 mil millones en el caso del talco de Johnson & Johnson. Reconocido por Super Lawyers como Rising Star (2016) y nombrado a LawDragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Lawyers (2020).

Headshot of Michelle Greene, Senior Attorney in our Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability practice.
Michelle Greene

leer más

Abogada Senior
Michelle Greene se dedica a responsabilidad farmacéutica y de productos, con un enfoque en daños tóxicos. Ha representado a clientes en casos de contaminación por AFFF y PFAS. Reconocida por Best Lawyers como “Ones to Watch” (2024-2025) y mencionada en la lista de Next Generation de Lawdragon (2025) en Litigios para Demandantes.

Headshot of Patrice McKinney, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury, product liability, and FELA.
Patrice McKinney

leer más

Abogada Senior
Patrice McKinney se dedica a lesiones personales, responsabilidad por productos y casos FELA, con enfoque en trabajadores ferroviarios lesionados en el trabajo, colisiones de automóviles y camiones, y lesiones en campos petroleros. Reconocida como Texas Super Lawyer (2017-2024) y Best Lawyers (2024-2025) en Lesiones Personales.

Headshot of Rachel Lanier, Managing Attorney, Los Angeles, Product Liability and Pharmaceutical Liability
Rachel Lanier

leer más

Abogada Gerente, Los Ángeles
Rachel Lanier se dedica a responsabilidad farmacéutica y por productos, ayudando a asegurar el veredicto de $4.6 mil millones en Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson. Lidera demandas por adicción a las redes sociales y representa a clientes en MDLs. Reconocida por Best Lawyers (2024-2025) en Daños Masivos y Lesiones Personales.

Headshot of Rebecca Phillips, The Lanier Law Firm's Mass Torts Director.
Rebecca Phillips

leer más

Directora de Litigios por Daños Masivos
Rebecca Phillips se dedica a responsabilidad farmacéutica, litigios comerciales y apelaciones. Co-líder del litigio de Bard Implant, también ayudó a asegurar miles de millones en compensación por opioides para Texas. Honores recientes incluyen Super Lawyers Rising Star y Lawdragon 500 (2024-2025), entre otros.

Headshot of Sam E. Taylor, Senior Litigation Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm Personal Injury practice.
Sam E. Taylor

leer más

Abogado Asesor de Litigios Senior
Sam es “board-certified” en Derecho de Juicios por Lesiones Personales y Derecho Civil, con más de 30 años de experiencia. Ha llevado a cabo 50+ juicios civiles con jurado, incluyendo casos de mesotelioma y muerte por negligencia. Reconocido como Texas Super Lawyer desde 2008, tiene calificación AV Preeminent por más de 25 años.

Headshot of Zeke DeRose, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney, Business Litigation
Zeke DeRose

leer más

Abogado Senior
Zeke DeRose se dedica a litigios comerciales, antimonopolio y responsabilidad por productos. Forma parte del equipo legal en un caso antimonopolio contra Google y representa al Estado de Arkansas en litigios contra Meta. Reconocido por Lawdragon 500 (2025) y Best Lawyers (2025), Zeke es miembro del Top 100 de National Trial Lawyers.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Catherine Heacox, part of the Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical and Product Liability practice.
Catherine Heacox

leer más

Abogada Senior
Catherine Heacox se dedica a responsabilidad farmacéutica, lesiones personales y responsabilidad por productos. Reconocida como Super New York Metro Super Lawyer desde el 2013, Catherine tiene una amplia experiencia en litigios de MDL (Litigios Multidistritales) y daños masivos o demandas colectivas.

Headshot of attorney Richard D. Meadow who serves as Of Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm.
Richard Meadow

leer más

Abogado Asesor
La amplia experiencia legal de Richard Meadow abarca múltiples áreas de práctica y jurisdicciones. Es reconocido en Best Lawyers 2025 por su trabajo en Litigios de Responsabilidad por Daños Masivos y Litigios por Lesiones Personales. Con más de tres décadas de experiencia, Richard ha dedicado su carrera a defender los derechos de las personas lesionadas.

Headshot of the Lanier Law Firm's attorney Kelsey Stokes
Kelsey Stokes

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Kelsey Stokes is dedicated to mass tort litigation, product liability, and complex litigation. With extensive experience in trial and settlement negotiations, she continues to be a leader in medical device litigation recognized by Super Lawyers Rising Stars (2022).

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm senior attorney Lee Cirsch
Lee Cirsch

LEER MÁS

Abogado Senior
Lee Cirsch tiene más de dos décadas de experiencia en juicios de casos de lesiones personales, responsabilidad por productos y litigios comerciales. Su experiencia representando tanto a demandantes como a demandados le otorga una habilidad única para anticipar la estrategia de su oponente, lo que brinda a sus clientes una valiosa ventaja en litigios.