Talcum Powder and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit

Open, accepting new clients

In recent years, talcum powder has made headlines for its potentially cancer-causing properties. This household essential has been identified as a risk factor for ovarian cancer in women. Talcum powder has long been a popular personal hygiene product and is a key ingredient in many other common household products.

The widespread use of talcum powder, coupled with its ties to ovarian cancer, has resulted in billion-dollar jury awards in talcum powder lawsuits aimed at restoring justice to the women whose lives and fertility have been harmed by talcum powder products and the company that marketed it to consumers for decades.

What Is Talc?

Talc is a naturally occurring mineral composed of magnesium, silicon, oxygen, and hydrogen. It is frequently found in metamorphic rock and mined from the earth. Asbestos sometimes forms in the same area as talc, and asbestos veins can run through talc formations, resulting in contamination.

Talc is the world’s softest mineral. It is easy to cut and crush. It is the main ingredient in talcum powder and is prized for its softness, absorbency, dry lubricant properties, and cleansing abilities. Talc can be found in everyday products, including cosmetics, first aid powders, antiperspirants, baby powder, body powder, plastics, rubber, ceramics, roofing materials, paper, and paint.

How Does Talc Cause Ovarian Cancer?

Applying talcum powder directly to the genital area or sanitary napkins is a common women’s hygiene practice. Many studies have examined, in particular, whether direct genital use increases the risk of ovarian cancer. With each application, asbestos-tainted talc particles may travel to the ovaries, and the body cannot break down the asbestos fibers. Over time, they cause inflammation, which damages DNA and ultimately leads to cancer.

The scientific community has also established a connection between inhaled asbestos and ovarian cancer. Inhaled asbestos in baby powder enters the lungs and can travel to other body parts, such as the ovaries. While ovarian cancer is the most well-known cancer associated with asbestos in talc, the following cancers have also been linked to asbestos in talc:

  • Endometrioid ovarian cancer
  • Fallopian tube cancer
  • Mesothelioma
  • Peritoneal cancer
  • Serious epithelial cancer

What the Science Says About Baby Powder Cancer and Ovarian Tumors

Researchers first identified talc in ovarian cancer tumors in 1971, sparking the beginning of scientific inquiry into the link between talc and ovarian cancer. In 2020, researchers found asbestos in 8 of 10 tissue samples taken from ovarian tumors in women with confirmed talc use, and it was the same type known to contaminate talc. In May 2024, the Journal of Clinical Oncology published a study of 50,884 women that confirmed the link between ovarian cancer and genital talc use.

Studies of talc and ovarian cancer work to distinguish between talc contaminated with asbestos and uncontaminated talc. For now, the scientific consensus holds that there is a direct link between ovarian cancer risk and talcum powder that contains trace amounts of asbestos. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, or IARC, identifies asbestos-containing talc as carcinogenic to humans.

What Are the Symptoms of Ovarian Cancer?

Symptoms of ovarian cancer are more likely to appear once the disease has progressed into the later stages. However, some women might experience symptoms earlier on. According to the American Cancer Society, the most common signs of ovarian cancer are abdominal and pelvic pain, bloating, difficulty eating, feeling full quickly, and urinary urgency or frequency. These symptoms can also be signs of several other conditions. This can make it difficult to diagnose ovarian cancer promptly.

Secondary symptoms of ovarian cancer that not all women experience might include:

  • Fatigue
  • Back pain
  • Weight loss
  • Constipation
  • Painful intercourse
  • Heavy or irregular bleeding during menstruation

 

If you’re experiencing any of these symptoms, you should see a doctor and discuss the possibility of ovarian cancer. Ignoring symptoms will allow the disease to progress untreated.

How Is Ovarian Cancer Diagnosed?

If your doctor suspects that you have ovarian cancer, you’ll undergo a series of testing procedures to make a conclusive diagnosis. Diagnostic attempts will begin with the least invasive options and progress as necessary. A conclusive diagnosis may involve the following procedures:

  • Pelvic exam
  • Imaging
  • Blood tests
  • Diagnostic surgery
  • DNA testing

 

Diagnostic procedures will vary and may depend on the extent to which cancer has progressed. Once a doctor has confirmed that ovarian cancer is present, the patient will then be assigned a rating of stage 1 through stage 4. The stage of cancer indicates how far it has spread throughout the body.

What Are the Treatment Options for Ovarian Cancer?

Treatment options for ovarian cancer depend on the stage and how far the cancer has progressed and include the following:

  • Surgery to remove ovaries or uterus
  • Chemotherapy
  • Targeted drug therapy
  • Hormone therapy
  • Immunotherapy
  • Palliative care

 

The treatment suggested by your doctor will depend on the stage and location of the cancer, as well as other relevant health factors that might impact treatment outcomes.

Call 800-723-3216 now to see how we can help you get the justice you deserve. Consultations are free.

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson is the best-known talcum powder manufacturer and the primary defendant in talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits. More than 62,000 people have filed baby powder lawsuits against J&J.

Johnson & Johnson’s Attempts to Evade Liability

J&J has filed for bankruptcy twice using a legal maneuver known as the “Texas two-step,” which involved establishing a new subsidiary named LTL, transferring liabilities to it, and having LTL file for bankruptcy. LTL first filed for bankruptcy in October 2021, two days after its formation. At the time, J&J was facing 38,000 lawsuits.

The court rejected the bankruptcy in January 2023. Had the court allowed it, victims of baby powder cancer would have lost the right to sue J&J. Their only option would have been to file claims for significantly reduced trust fund payouts. J&J applied for bankruptcy again, but the court denied the bankruptcy in July of the same year.

J&J has filed bankruptcy again through another subsidiary, Red River Talc. It is proposing a $10 billion settlement as part of its bankruptcy reorganization to resolve the 62,000 lawsuits. This money would be deposited into an asbestos trust fund. If $10 billion were divided evenly among 62,000 claimants, each would receive $161,290. While some would receive more and some less, these amounts are significantly lower than the damages J&J would pay in most baby powder lawsuits.

What Other Companies Are Named In Talc Lawsuits?

Any company that has manufactured, imported, marketed, distributed, or sold asbestos-containing talc may be liable for cancer resulting from its use. The following companies have been named as defendants in talc baby powder lawsuits:

  • Avon
  • CVS
  • Chattem, a subsidiary of Sanofi
  • Colgate-Palmolive
  • Imerys Talc North America
  • Target
  • Vanderbilt Minerals
  • Walgreens
  • Walmart
  • Whittaker, Clark & Daniels

 

Products allegedly linked to ovarian cancer include Gold Bond powders and sprays, Old Spice powder, and Shower to Shower. Asbestos has also been found in Ammens and Desenex products. Independent lab testing detected chrysotile asbestos fibers in multiple unopened containers of both powders. One Desenex sample also tested positive for tremolite asbestos, a known carcinogen. The FDA has also identified asbestos in Beauty Plus Global and Claire’s cosmetics.

What Are the Most Recent FDA Efforts To Protect Consumers From Talc-Containing Cosmetics?

On December 26, 2024, the FDA proposed a groundbreaking rule aimed at addressing the risks posed by asbestos-contaminated talc in cosmetics. This rule mandates dual-method testing to detect asbestos fibers, including both Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). The goal is to ensure that talc-based cosmetics undergo thorough testing, which has long been insufficient in identifying dangerous asbestos contamination.

The proposed rule represents a monumental shift in how the cosmetic industry addresses asbestos contamination. For decades, testing methods like the CTFA Method J4-1 and USP Talc monograph were widely used but failed to detect dangerous levels of chrysotile asbestos, the most common and deadly form. These methods only tested for amphibole minerals, and even then, only if they exceeded a threshold of 0.5% by weight. This threshold allowed talc products to pass safety tests even when they contained billions of asbestos fibers, putting consumers at risk.

The FDA’s new rule will require more rigorous testing, mandating that both PLM and TEM methods be used together to detect even the smallest asbestos fibers. TEM, in particular, is capable of identifying individual fibers as small as 0.04 micrometers—a sensitivity that could prevent exposure to harmful asbestos levels. This dual-method approach promises a major improvement over current industry standards, marking a significant victory for consumer safety.

“This rule represents the most significant advancement in cosmetic safety regulation in decades, providing at least some protection consumers have deserved all along. The only true protection would be to ban talc in cosmetics, pharmaceutical, food and other consumer products.” – Darron E. Berquist

Get a Free Legal Consultation

The Importance of Working With a Talcum Powder Lawsuit Attorney

Having an experienced talcum powder lawsuit attorney on your side is crucial for going up against large corporations like Johnson & Johnson. With our award-winning law firm on your side, you can focus on recovery while we do everything else, including:

  • Investigate your baby powder asbestos exposure. We will identify every talc-containing product you were exposed to and the companies responsible for it.
  • Gather evidence. We will delve into our database of private investigation materials and gather additional evidence to build the strongest case possible.
  • Advocate for you. We will deal with the defendants’ insurance companies and lawyers and negotiate aggressively for the settlement you deserve.
  • Represent you in court. We will fight for you in court if the defendants refuse to pay fair compensation.

 

We have been handling asbestos-exposure claims for over 25 years and have recovered over $20 billion in settlements and verdicts. We recently won a $39 million verdict for a client who developed mesothelioma from talc pleurodesis, a medical procedure used to treat a collapsed lung.

The Lanier Law Firm’s Successful Talc Ovarian Cancer Cases Against Johnson & Johnson

Our talcum powder lawsuit attorneys have been on the front lines against Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products. Attorney Mark Lanier has been featured in Reuters and The New York Times articles investigating Johnson & Johnson’s role in asbestos-laced talc and the dire health ramifications of the company’s products.

In July 2018, The Lanier Law Firm secured a $4.69 billion verdict for 22 women and their families. The winning lawsuit showed that decades of using Johnson & Johnson baby powder had caused ovarian cancer. It made history as the first jury verdict affirming the link between asbestos-laced talcum powder and ovarian cancer. Our ovarian cancer lawyers successfully fought back against J&J’s attempts to evade responsibility in the Missouri Appellate Court in 2020 and the U.S. Supreme Court in 2021.

We continue to fight for victims of asbestos exposure, including through talc use, and have obtained the following results:

Headshot of Michael A. Akselrud, Senior Attorney in our Business Litigation, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Michael A. Akselrud
Senior Attorney

Michael A. Akselrud specializes in personal injury, business litigation, and product liability. He was part of the trial team that secured a $4.69 billion verdict in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder case. Recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star (2016) and named to LawDragon 500 (2020).

Contact Our Firm

Schedule a FREE Consultation or Call
800-723-3216

First Name(Required)
Last Name(Required)

Schedule Your Free Consultation Today

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Frequently Asked Questions

Who Qualifies for the Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

You may be eligible to file a talc lawsuit if you meet the following criteria:

  • Received a confirmed diagnosis of ovarian, peritoneal, or invasive fallopian tube cancer or mesothelioma
  • A history of using talc-based baby powder daily for at least four years
  • A positive biopsy showing evidence of talcum powder
  • No genetic disorder that predisposes you to ovarian cancer
  • Loss of a family member who met the above criteria

If you meet this criteria, contact our firm immediately for a free consultation.

How Long Do I Have to File a Talc Lawsuit?

Every state sets its own deadline, known as a statute of limitations, for when you must file a baby powder cancer lawsuit. The talcum powder lawsuit statute of limitations in most states is two or three years after your diagnosis or when you discover its connection to baby powder. However, the deadline may be shorter or longer in your state.

Our knowledgeable talcum powder cancer lawyers can determine the best venue for your claim and how the statute of limitations applies. It is important to contact us as soon as possible so we have ample opportunity to gather evidence, build your case, and file your lawsuit in the jurisdiction that will be most advantageous for you.

How Much Do Talcum Powder Lawyers Charge?

We operate on a contingency basis with no upfront fees. We also cover the costs associated with litigation, including expert witness fees, filing fees, and travel expenses, with no obligation for you unless we win. If we recover compensation for you, we will collect our costs and fees from your proceeds. The fee will be a percentage of your compensation, which we will disclose upfront.

Headshot of Lawrence P. Wilson, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury and product liability.
Lawrence P. Wilson

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Lawrence P. Wilson specializes in personal injury, product liability, medical malpractice, and certain maritime matters. He recently settled a $17.5 million personal injury case and secured a favorable verdict in Schwab v. Ford Motor Company. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2012-2021) and named to Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Lawyers.

Headshot of Alex Abston, Senior Attorney in Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability.
Alex Abston

Read Bio

Attorney
Alex Abston specializes in pharmaceutical liability, product liability, and mass torts. She was part of the trial team that obtained one of the first federal jury verdicts in MDL 2804, In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation. Honors include Lawdragon 500 Next Generation (2024) and Texas’ Top 40 Under 40 (2021-2024), among others.

Headshot of Alex Brown, Managing Attorney for the Lanier Law Firm Business Litigation practice.
Alex Brown

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Business Litigation
Alex Brown specializes in business litigation, handling complex disputes in federal, state, and international forums. He led trial teams to secure a $9 billion jury award in the Actos case. Recent honors include Best Lawyers (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2025), among others.

Headshot of attorney Benjamin T. Major from the Lanier Law Firm's Issues and Appeals legal team.
Benjamin T. Major

Read Bio

Attorney
Benjamin T. Major specializes in issues and appeals, helping preserve multi-billion dollar judgments and secure favorable settlements. Notable achievements include preserving a tort judgment for ovarian cancer victims and defeating motions in antitrust and false claims litigation. Recognized as a Texas Rising Star (2018-2020), among others.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Case A. Dam, part of the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Case A. Dam

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Case A. Dam specializes in asbestos exposure, representing clients with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and related cancers. He has served veterans, automotive mechanics, and workers in various industries. Recognized in the 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers, among others.

Headshot of Darron E. Berquist, Managing Attorney Asbestos Litigation for the Lanier Law Firm.
Darron E. Berquist

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Litigation
Darron E. Berquist specializes in asbestos exposure and product liability. He was part of the team that secured a $4.69 billion jury verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, linking asbestos in talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of David L. Rosenband, Senior Attorney practicing Personal Injury and Pharmaceutical and Product Liability.
David L. Rosenband

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
David L. Rosenband specializes in pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. He served as Liaison Counsel in the New York Bextra/Celebrex litigation and helped secure a $9 million verdict in the NJ Accutane case. Recognized for his work in MDLs and state court litigations.

Headshot of Evan M. Janush, Managing Attorney, New York, for Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical Liability, and Product Liability.
Evan M. Janush

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, New York
Evan M. Janush oversees the firm’s pharmaceutical and product liability mass tort litigation in New York. He served on the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in MDL 2804 and was part of the trial team in the Vioxx cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Judson A. Waltman is a Lanier Law Firm Managing Attorney for product liability, personal injury and maritime law.
Judson A. Waltman

Read Bio

Judson A. Waltman specializes in personal injury, product liability, and maritime law. He secured one of the largest verdicts in Ward County, Texas, for an injured oilfield worker and a $2 million verdict for a Central Texas worker. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Personal Injury and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of Kevin LaMarca, Senior Attorney in the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Kevin LaMarca

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Kevin LaMarca specializes in asbestos exposure, personal injury, and product liability. He secured multiple seven-figure settlements, including $2.25 million for a deceased papermill worker’s family. Recognized as a National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, Kevin represents clients across the country in both state and federal courts.

Headshot of Manny Cabrera, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney for the asbestos exposure and mesothelioma practice.
Manny Cabrera

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Manny Cabrera specializes in asbestos exposure and catastrophic injury cases. He has represented clients in asbestos-related matters and personal injury, as well as trucking and premises liability cases. Honored as a National Trial Lawyers Civil Plaintiff Top 40 Under 40.

Headshot of Maura Kolb, Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution in the mesothelioma and pharmaceutical liability practice.
Maura Kolb

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution
Maura Kolb leads the Asbestos Resolution Team, securing millions for clients annually. She was part of the team that won a $258 million Vioxx verdict and has coordinated BP Gulf Oil Spill settlements. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2024), Maura serves on several national asbestos trust advisory committees.

Headshot of Megan Waida, Senior Attorney in the Lanier Law Firm's Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Megan Waida

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Megan Waida specializes in asbestos exposure and appellate cases. Named to the National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 (2018-2021), Megan advocates for asbestos victims and has a strong background in complex litigation.

Headshot of Michael A. Akselrud, Senior Attorney in our Business Litigation, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Michael A. Akselrud

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michael A. Akselrud specializes in personal injury, business litigation, and product liability. He was part of the trial team that secured a $4.69 billion verdict in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder case. Recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star (2016) and named to LawDragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Michelle Greene, Senior Attorney in our Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability practice.
Michelle Greene

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michelle Greene specializes in pharmaceutical and product liability, with a focus on toxic torts. She represented clients in AFFF and PFAS contamination cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers as “”Ones to Watch”” (2024-2025) and listed in Lawdragon’s Next Generation (2025) for Plaintiff Litigation.

Headshot of Patrice McKinney, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury, product liability, and FELA.
Patrice McKinney

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Patrice McKinney specializes in personal injury, product liability, and FELA cases, with a focus on railroad workers injured on the job, car and trucking collisions, and oilfield injuries. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2017-2024) and Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Personal Injury.

Headshot of Rachel Lanier, Managing Attorney, Los Angeles, Product Liability and Pharmaceutical Liability
Rachel Lanier

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Los Angeles
Rachel Lanier specializes in pharmaceutical and product liability, helping secure the $4.6 billion verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson. Recognized by Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Mass Tort and Personal Injury, Rachel leads the firm’s social media addiction lawsuits and represents clients in high-profile MDLs.

Headshot of Rebecca Phillips, The Lanier Law Firm's Mass Torts Director.
Rebecca Phillips

Read Bio

Mass Torts Director
Rebecca Phillips specializes in pharmaceutical liability, business litigation, and appeals. Co-lead counsel in the Bard Implant litigation, she also helped secure billions in opioid recovery for Texas. Recent honors include Super Lawyers Rising Star and Lawdragon 500 (2024-2025), among others.

Headshot of Sam E. Taylor, Senior Litigation Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm Personal Injury practice.
Sam E. Taylor

Read Bio

Senior Litigation Counsel
Sam E. Taylor is board-certified in Personal Injury Trial Law and Civil Trial Law, with over 30 years of experience. He has tried over 50 civil jury trials, including mesothelioma and wrongful death cases. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer since 2008, Sam holds an AV Preeminent Rating for 25+ years.

Headshot of Zeke DeRose, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney, Business Litigation
Zeke DeRose

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Zeke DeRose specializes in business litigation, antitrust, and product liability. He is part of the legal team in an antitrust case against Google and represents the State of Arkansas in litigation against Meta. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2025) and Best Lawyers (2025), Zeke is a member of the National Trial Lawyers Top 100.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Catherine Heacox, part of the Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical and Product Liability practice.
Catherine Heacox

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Catherine Heacox specializes in pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. Recognized by Super Lawyers as New York Metro Super Lawyer since 2013, Catherine has extensive experience in MDL and mass tort litigation.

Headshot of attorney Richard D. Meadow who serves as Of Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm.
Richard Meadow

Read Bio

Of Counsel
Richard Meadow’s broad legal experience spans multiple practice areas and jurisdictions. He is recognized in Best Lawyers 2025 for his work in Mass Tort Litigation and Personal Injury Litigation. With over three decades of experience, Richard has dedicated his career to championing the rights of injured individuals.