Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
Teens and young adults are particularly vulnerable to the extremely harmful effects of social media addiction, including depression, self-harm, eating disorders, suicidal ideation, and injury of suicide. Social media companies have designed their platforms to be addictive, putting profits over the safety of their users. The Lanier Law Firm is helping victims fight back through social media addiction lawsuits. Contact us today at 800-723-3216 for a free case evaluation.
- Content Reviewed by:
- Rachel Lanier
- Page Last Updated:
- December 10, 2025
Navigate This Page
- Why You’ll Want The Lanier Law Firm to Handle Your Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
- Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Updates
- What Is Social Media Addiction?
- Algorithms Feed Social Media Addiction
- Social Media Companies Know Their Platforms are Addictive — and They Don’t Care
- Who Can File a Social Media Lawsuit?
- What Compensation Can I Recover in a Social Media Addiction Lawsuit?
- Call The Lanier Law Firm to Discuss Your Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
Why You’ll Want The Lanier Law Firm to Handle Your Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
Social media has become addictive, and Meta, Snapchat, and TikTok know it. They also know that social media addiction is causing serious mental health issues, especially in its youngest, most impressionable users.
Social media companies don’t care about you or your children. They care about money. When taking on these giants, you’ll need an advocate with the resources and experience to match.
If you or your child or teen have suffered harm because of an addiction to social media, now is the time to stand up and take action. You may have the right to file a social media addiction lawsuit and hold the billion-dollar social media giants accountable. Call The Lanier Law Firm for help. We’re not afraid to take on billion-dollar corporations or powerful defendants. We do it on behalf of our clients every day.
Founder Mark Lanier and seasoned product liability attorneys Rachel Lanier and Michael A. Akselrud understand just how devastating the effects of social media addiction can be, and they genuinely care about the clients they represent.
September 17, 2025
Rachel Lanier maintains her pivotal role as co-lead counsel in the California Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding (“JCCP”) for social media addiction litigation. She is overseeing case coordination as expert depositions continue at a significant pace. Both plaintiffs and defendants have recently filed competing motions, each seeking to exclude certain claims and expert testimony from trial proceedings. Despite the ongoing motions and discovery disputes, the landmark trial remains on track for its scheduled late-November commencement. The outcome of the parties’ expert challenges and evidentiary rulings will likely shape the scope and strategy for what promises to be a closely watched trial.
May 7, 2025
On April 15, 2025, the judge overseeing the state court litigation selected nine bellwether cases to be set for trial, starting on November 25, 2025. The trials will run consecutively, one after the next, until all cases are tried or otherwise resolved. Bellwether selection comes after the conclusion of months of case-specific discovery, including Plaintiff and family member depositions. Depositions of corporate representatives have also taken place, including the deposition of Snap co-founder and CEO Evan Spiegel. Additional discovery, including expert disclosures and depositions, is expected in the coming months.
January 27, 2025
A California appellate court summarily denied Defendants’ petition for a writ of mandate challenging an order from Judge Kuhl denying Defendants’ motion to strike claims because of purported §230 protections.
January 8, 2025
Judge Kuhl issued this order denying the Defendants’ demurrer and motion to strike claims involving failure to warn, clearing the way for Plaintiffs to pursue such claims in the ongoing social media addiction litigation.
December 6, 2024
An appellate court denied the platforms’ petition in appeal.
October 25, 2024
A federal judge has allowed a major lawsuit by school districts against social media companies to proceed, marking a significant development in the ongoing battle over youth safety online. The case consolidates hundreds of claims from plaintiffs, including injured individuals, school districts, and state attorneys general, against platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat.
Judge Gonzalez Rogers’ 45-page ruling rejected the platforms’ attempts to dismiss the case, finding that plaintiffs can seek damages for harms allegedly caused by addictive design features targeting minors. Notably, the order clarified that Section 230 and First Amendment protections don’t shield platforms from claims related to inadequate age verification systems, insufficient parental controls, and lack of default limits on usage time and frequency.
The plaintiffs argue these platforms are deliberately designed to foster compulsive use by young users, resulting in widespread harm to children, communities, and public health. This ruling represents a crucial step toward potential accountability for social media companies’ product design choices affecting young users.
September 16, 2024
The parties are continuing to engage in discovery, and depositions of corporate witnesses are scheduled over the coming months. Additional depositions are likely to take place following further document productions from Defendants. In the meantime, the parties have agreed to a four-month trial extension to allow for time to conduct that additional discovery. The school districts have filed notices of appeal regarding the sustaining demurrer dismissing their claims.
June 11, 2024
In early June, the California JCCP decided that four school districts cannot pursue their claims against Meta, Snap, Google, YouTube, and TikTok. The Court sustained Defendants’ demurrer concerning school districts in Rhode Island, California, Florida, and Washington, rejecting those districts’ arguments that they should be compensated for the disruption to students’ educations. Although some of the Court’s statements concerning Section 230 were disappointing, it is worth noting that, in a different case against Meta, the Ninth Circuit days ago reiterated that that Section 230 is “not limitless,” with one judge calling on the Ninth Circuit to reexamine precedent that broadly interprets Section 230.
Individual cases remain active. Production of evidence and depositions of witnesses have begun. A trial is expected in October 2025.
Previous Lawsuit Updates
May 7, 2024
In the federal MDL, both sides have made bellwether trial picks. In the California coordinated proceedings, in mid-June, the Court will select 24 bellwether cases randomly, with a goal for trial to begin in June of 2025. In the meantime, the parties continue to identify relevant witnesses and negotiate for the production of documents.
April 18, 2024
In the federal MDL, both sides have made bellwether trial picks. In the California coordinated proceedings, in mid-June, the Court will select 24 bellwether cases randomly, with a goal for trial to begin in June of 2025. In the meantime, the parties continue to identify relevant witnesses and negotiate for the production of documents.
March 8, 2024
The Lanier Law Firm has filed additional cases against social media companies, and several courts have now ruled that lawsuits can proceed. The companies have been ordered to engage in discovery and to produce documents that concern their harmful conduct. Trials may begin to take place at some point next year.
January 31, 2024
In a four-hour Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today, senators from both sides of the aisle questioned social media CEOs about the risks their platforms pose to young people. Today’s hearing focused specifically on issues related to child exploitation and generally on the mental health impacts of social media.
CEOs from Meta, TikTok, Snapchat, X, and Discord acknowledged shortcomings and highlighted initiatives they have taken to address the issue. Senators at the hearing recognized their failure to pass any federal legislation to regulate how children interact with social media, citing lobbying efforts by the social media companies and a lack of congressional support.
There are now close to 500 actions filed against social media companies. Discovery has opened, and the lawyers for the victims are looking closely through the documents produced by the social media companies to build their case as to the negligent conduct. The lawyers for the victims, including the Lanier Law Firm, are also leading the fight for more transparency and a greater production of documents to fully expose the conduct and harms imposed on our nation’s youth.
November 7, 2023
In a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and Law today, a second whistleblower testified that Meta was aware of the harm young users faced on their apps but chose not to take measures to stem it. Arturo Bejar, a former Facebook engineering director and Instagram consultant, said Meta leadership ignored his research and dismissed safety recommendations for Facebook and Instagram.
Senators at the subcommittee meeting called for the passage of the bipartisan “Kids Safety Online Act” bill that establishes guidelines for protecting children and teens on social media platforms.
October 24, 2023
Today, a bipartisan group of 42 attorneys general filed a federal lawsuit against Meta, alleging that Facebook and Instagram have features that are addictive and specifically target children and teenagers.
The lawsuit also alleges that Meta violated its obligations under the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by unlawfully collecting the personal data of its youngest users without parents’ consent.
October 13, 2023
Today, the California JCCP determined that social media plaintiffs’ negligence claims will move forward. The court asked “whether a social media company may maximize its own benefit and advertising revenue at the expense of the health of minor users” and whether the law provides a remedy for such behavior. While the court found that the social media platform is not a “product” for the purpose of applying products liability statutes, it also determined that Defendants can be sued for negligence. Neither are they entitled to escape negligence liability by either federal immunity statutes or the First Amendment. The court further determined that plaintiffs adequately pled their claim for fraudulent concealment, protecting plaintiffs’ statute of limitations.
September 2023
There are currently 408 cases pending in the MDL.
July 2023
A key deadline for the social media addiction multi-district litigation (MDL) is on the horizon. The deadline for the initial motion to dismiss and the corresponding opposition and reply passed in June, with no motion filed. However, another deadline, specifically for the Motion to Dismiss on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the First Amendment Deadline, is coming on August 15, 2003.
Section 230 protects internet-based companies like Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat from liability for third-party content. Courts have applied Section 230 to several cases, including negligence cases, leading many to believe the defense will cite the statute as part of their strategy.
March 2023
On March 28, 2023, the Arkansas Attorney General and Governor announced that The Lanier Law Firm would join them in pursuing litigation against Meta, the company behind the social media platforms Facebook and Instagram, seeking to recover costs incurred in treating neurological disorders and addiction-induced behaviors caused by the excessive use of their platforms by children and adolescents. Read the full Meta lawsuit complaint and listen to Mark Lanier discussing the case:
What Is Social Media Addiction?
Social media addiction is characterized by the compulsive urge to spend time on social media. Our brains release feel-good chemicals when we engage on social media. The more we engage, the better we feel. So, we keep coming back for more.
It’s no different than becoming addicted to nicotine, alcohol, or gambling. Over time, it takes increasing amounts of the thing that’s making us feel good to satisfy us. That’s why we begin to experience a compulsive urge to check social media.
While adults can become addicted to social media and experience adverse effects, the most significant problems tend to be seen in kids, teens, and young adults.
Signs of social media addiction, particularly in teenagers, include:
- Increased screen time and time spent on social media platforms
- Constantly checking social media, especially first thing in the morning
- Staying up late scrolling social media
- Anxiety related to extended breaks from or the inability to check social media
- Using social media as a “pick me up” when you’re feeling blue
- Spending less time with friends, family, and peers in person
- Spending less time engaging in enjoyable activities
- Changes in personal relationships
- Struggling at work or school
- Creating fake social media accounts or hiding social media accounts from friends or parents
- Marked changes in mood, behavior, and overall health
If you’ve experienced these symptoms or recognize them in your teenager, speak with a licensed mental health professional about your social media use.
You may also want to speak with an experienced social media addiction lawyer, as you may have the right to take legal action if you’ve suffered any ill effects.
Call 800-723-3216 now to explore your legal options after social media addiction harms your teen. Consultations are free.
Algorithms Feed Social Media Addiction
Companies behind social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok are billion-dollar entities. These platforms are free to use, so the companies make their money on advertising. The more time users spend scrolling their social media feeds, the more money the companies make.
So, there’s an incentive to make users crave social media and keep them coming back for more.
You’ve probably heard about algorithms, which are essentially a list of instructions that tells the social platform which content to serve to users based on their interests and behaviors on social media. In theory, the algorithms should individualize each user’s experience and provide relevant content, filtering out what they don’t want to see.
In reality, the more we see content we like or that evokes an emotional response, the more likely it becomes that we spend more time scrolling social media.
Further, the more “likes” we get on posts and the more notifications we receive, the more addictive social media becomes. These things release dopamine — the feel-good chemical — and make us crave more.
Social media companies understand this and have taken algorithms to an entirely new level, using them to make their products intentionally addictive.
The more time that people — particularly kids, teens, and young adults — spend on social media, the more likely it becomes that they’ll suffer from depression, anxiety, suicidal ideations, and other mental health problems.
In fact, social media addiction statistics indicate that teenagers who spend three or more hours online are at an increased risk of these issues. The average teen spends three hours and one minute using social media, and some log as many as seven hours online.
Social Media Companies Know Their Platforms are Addictive — and They Don’t Care
Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, among others, are built to be addictive.
According to Facebook’s former director of monetization, Tim Kendall, Facebook knowingly made its social media platform “as addictive as cigarettes.”
In an interview, Kendall acknowledged that Facebook’s objective is to “get more people to pay attention to your product and to pay attention longer each and every day.” The company created algorithms to make this happen, essentially luring vulnerable and impressionable teenagers onto the platform.
Kendall called Facebook “fundamentally addictive” and admitted that “it’s causing all kinds of mental health issues … [and] eroding aspects of society.”
Kendall’s sentiments were confirmed by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who testified before the U.S. Committee on Science, Commerce, and Transportation on October 4, 2021.
In her testimony, she explained that Facebook executives “repeatedly encountered conflicts between its own profits and our safety” and “consistently resolved those conflicts in favor of its own profits.”
Simply put, social media companies knowingly prioritize profits over the health and well-being of their users.
Get a Free Legal Consultation
- Experienced trial lawyers helping families impacted by social media addiction
- Over $20 billion recovered for our clients
- No upfront costs or fees
Who Can File a Social Media Lawsuit?
Social media lawsuits have taken the nation by storm, with more than 1,200 families (and counting) taking legal action.
You may have the right to file a social media addiction lawsuit if:
- You spend three or more hours using social media every day.
- Your social media addiction began before you turned 21.
- Social media addiction has caused psychological or physical harm, including suicide, attempted suicide, self-harm, depression, anxiety, and/or eating disorders.
- You have sought or received treatment for said psychological or physical harm.
Snapchat Fentanyl Lawsuits
Snap Inc., owners of the popular app Snapchat, is also facing legal action from families whose children died due to fentanyl poisoning after using the app to purchase drugs. The app’s unique features, such as disappearing content, make it difficult for parents to monitor their children’s activities on the app.
In the case of fentanyl deaths, another Snapchat feature, Snap Maps, allows users to pinpoint their location, giving drug dealers direct access to children to target them as potential customers. Although children believed they were buying legitimate prescription drugs from dealers on the app, in almost all cases, dealers sold them counterfeit pills laced with Fentanyl instead.
If a Snapchat fentanyl death has impacted your family, The Lanier Law Firm can help. Our social media harm attorneys can help you determine your legal rights. We are currently taking cases on behalf of families who lost children due to the dangerous design of this app.
What Compensation Can I Recover in a Social Media Addiction Lawsuit?
The potential consequences of social media addiction can impact every aspect of a victim’s life. For teens, the effects can last a lifetime.
Body dysmorphia and eating disorders can cause severe damage to the body. Bullying and attempts to commit suicide can have detrimental effects on a person’s physical and mental health.
Depression, anxiety, and ADHD can fundamentally change the course of a young person’s life, driving them away from friends and family and onto dangerous paths.
Through a social media addiction lawsuit, you can demand compensation for the financial, physical, and emotional consequences you’ve endured.
Potential damages can include money for:
- Current and future medical bills
- Cognitive behavioral therapy
- Dialectical behavior therapy
- In-patient therapy services
- Lost job opportunities
- Reduced earning capacity
- Emotional distress
- Embarrassment
- Damage to reputation
- Wrongful death of a family member
You can also send a clear message to social media companies by seeking punitive damages, which can be awarded when there’s clear and convincing evidence that they intentionally caused harm or knowingly failed to disclose the risks associated with their apps and platforms.
Your lawsuit is an opportunity to hold these money- and power-hungry corporations accountable for their actions, while protecting future users from the same fate in the process.
The potential consequences of social media addiction can impact every aspect of a victim’s life. For teens, the effects can last a lifetime.
Body dysmorphia and eating disorders can cause severe damage to the body. Bullying and attempts to commit suicide can have detrimental effects on a person’s physical and mental health.
Depression, anxiety, and ADHD can fundamentally change the course of a young person’s life, driving them away from friends and family and onto dangerous paths.
Through a social media addiction lawsuit, you can demand compensation for the financial, physical, and emotional consequences you’ve endured.
Potential damages can include money for:
- Current and future medical bills
- Cognitive behavioral therapy
- Dialectical behavior therapy
- In-patient therapy services
- Lost job opportunities
- Reduced earning capacity
- Emotional distress
- Embarrassment
- Damage to reputation
- Wrongful death of a family member
You can also send a clear message to social media companies by seeking punitive damages, which can be awarded when there’s clear and convincing evidence that they intentionally caused harm or knowingly failed to disclose the risks associated with their apps and platforms.
Your lawsuit is an opportunity to hold these money- and power-hungry corporations accountable for their actions, while protecting future users from the same fate in the process.
Video Transcript
“My name is Zeke DeRose, and I am a senior attorney in the commercial litigation section at The Lanier Law Firm. And maybe more importantly, for purposes of this video, I’m also the father of three young girls.
One of the great things about working at The Lanier Law Firm is the opportunity to work on cases you’re passionate about, the opportunity to make a difference in people’s lives, not only individuals but communities, states, and sometimes even across the globe.
And I think that’s the opportunity we have here in our social media addiction case in Arkansas against Facebook and Instagram, against Meta. What we’re seeing over the course of the last 10, 15 years is an increase in the mental and physical health crisis with our young people, and at the same time we’re seeing an increase in social media addiction. And that’s because these companies like Facebook and Instagram continue to put profits ahead of safety regardless of the consequences. And they seemingly sit idly by and watch our schools and our communities and our states try and pick up the pieces.
And that’s because they’ve realized that the longer they can keep our young people on their apps, on their devices, the more likely they are to become addicted. And the more likely they are to become addicted, the more profitable our young kids are to them, the more revenue these companies can make.
And so what they’re doing to feed that addiction is they’re feeding them provocative material, salacious material, violence, sexual content, divisive content, because they want to keep them on the app, they want to keep that anticipation, that addiction, that dopamine hit, and the longer they’re on the more money they make.
But that dopamine hit of seeing that content, of having that addiction, is similar to a gambling addiction, is similar to drugs and alcohol. It’s the feeling you get when you pull the slot machine lever and it’s spinning and you’re wondering what is it going to land on? What is it going to hit on? And that’s when that dopamine hit comes similar to when our kids are scrolling on their Instagram feed and they’re wondering what’s going to come up next? What am I going to see? And I need to be on here.
The interesting thing is that delay sometimes, that delay in the feed of what’s coming up next isn’t necessarily because you have a slow internet connection, it isn’t because you have bad service, it’s built into the system to feed the addiction, to feed that need, and to play with that dopamine hit and that desire for more. And as we’re seeing this addiction rise, we’re seeing suicide rates go up, we’re seeing anxiety, depression, body dysmorphia, loneliness, all these things that our kids, our families, and our communities are having to grapple with.
Equally concerning or more concerning is that these companies knew and know that this is harmful to our kids, especially our girls, and yet they continued to double down because they could double their profits, they could make more money. And so I’m proud to have the opportunity to represent the families, the communities, and the people of Arkansas against these social media giants to hold them accountable.”
Rachel Lanier specializes in pharmaceutical and product liability, helping secure the $4.6 billion verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson. Recognized by Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Mass Tort and Personal Injury, Rachel leads the firm’s social media addiction lawsuits and represents clients in high-profile MDLs.
Call The Lanier Law Firm to Discuss Your Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
Social media is deliberately designed to be addictive. With addiction comes the risk of serious physical and mental health problems, including suicidal tendencies, eating disorders, and distorted self image.
Whether you’re personally struggling with social media addiction or caring for a teen or young adult who has become addicted, you shouldn’t have to bear this burden on your own.
Social media giants created this epidemic. They must be held accountable. The Lanier Law Firm is ready to stand beside you and fight for the justice you deserve.
We’re continually recognized as some of the most compelling, compassionate, and successful trial attorneys in the nation. Now, we’re ready to invest our considerable experience and resources in your social media addiction lawsuit.
We’re standing by 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Call to schedule a free consultation today.
Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Updates