Mesothelioma Lawsuit Statute of Limitations

Most asbestos and mesothelioma statutes of limitations give around three years to file a lawsuit. However, they could range from one year to six years from the date of diagnosis, depending on the state and the type of claim. The state where you or your loved one is diagnosed may not be the same as the one where the lawsuit is filed. Our award-winning attorneys understand these laws and will ensure you meet each deadline and remain eligible for compensation.

A mesothelioma lawsuit statute of limitations is a statutory deadline for filing a mesothelioma lawsuit. Each state sets its own civil statutes of limitations, so they vary in length. Even within the same state, the statute of limitations for different cases may vary based on their specific circumstances.

The timely filing of a mesothelioma lawsuit is crucial to recovering the compensation necessary to relieve victims and families of the financial burdens brought on by asbestos-related illnesses. The difficulties of coping with mesothelioma can cause legal matters to feel unimportant, but time is of the essence in these cases.

How Long Do I Have To File a Mesothelioma Claim?

“When a person is diagnosed with mesothelioma, the time within which they must file a lawsuit is governed by laws called statute of limitation and that are state laws. They vary from state to state, and the clock on the statute starts to run on the date of the diagnosis of mesothelioma, and every state is different. Some states have a one-year statute of limitations. Some have as many as two, three, or four years, so when a person is diagnosed, that clock starts running on that date; so it’s important to consult with a lawyer as soon as possible so as to not miss the opportunity to file a claim if that’s what the person wants to do.”

– Sam Taylor, Managing Attorney of Asbestos Litigation Houston

The Discovery Rule

The discovery rule allows the statute of limitations to begin accruing on the date the injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. This rule applies to mesothelioma claims. Thus, the statute of limitations on mesothelioma claims is generally the date of the diagnosis.

According to The Lanier Law Firm’s mesothelioma managing attorney in New York, Darron E. Berquist, victims of asbestos exposure benefit from the discovery rule.

“Most states have some form of a discovery rule, which means that the clock does not start to run for statute-of-limitations purposes until the injury — i.e., diagnosis — was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered,” says Mr. Berquist.

He goes on to explain that, in toxic-exposure cases, determining the applicable statute of limitations in a specific case may not be as straightforward as one may think.

“For example, it is not uncommon in asbestos cases for the injured person to have been exposed to asbestos from multiple sources, decades before their diagnosis, and in more than one state.”

It takes a specialized knowledge of the law and an advanced understanding of the intricacies of potential asbestos exposure to identify the jurisdiction and statute of limitations that apply in a specific mesothelioma case.

“When we are contacted by a client, our attorneys conduct a thorough investigation into the facts and circumstances of the client’s exposures to determine which statute (or statutes) of limitation may apply and guide the client in identifying the most appropriate jurisdiction(s) for their claims. With our nationwide reach, The Lanier Law Firm is able to handle cases in any jurisdiction,” says Berquist.

What Is a Statute of Repose?

A statute of repose is like a statute of limitations, except, according to Cornell Law School, it begins to accrue on the date of an action by the defendant, regardless of the plaintiff’s experience. Statutes of repose in mesothelioma claims typically range from four to 10 years.

The mesothelioma latency period after asbestos exposure is 10 to 40 years, meaning most mesothelioma patients are time-barred from filing a claim against construction professionals to whom the statutes of repose apply before they are diagnosed. However, this does not bar a mesothelioma claimant from filing a lawsuit against the manufacturers or suppliers of these products.

What Is the Statute of Limitations if My Family Member Dies?

After the tragic loss of a loved one, the family has the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of the estate of the deceased. The statute of limitations generally begins to accrue on the date of death. However, if the statute of limitations expired prior to the death, the family may also be time-barred from filing a wrongful death case, as is the case in Maryland.

The statutes of limitations in a wrongful death action are the same as in personal injury lawsuits in some states, but in other states, they are shorter.

Family members may have an option to file a survival action. A survival action is filed on behalf of the deceased when the decedent could have filed had they lived. In survival actions, the statute of limitations may differ from wrongful death cases.

The experienced and compassionate mesothelioma attorneys at The Lanier Law Firm can help you determine which civil actions apply in your situation.

What Does It Mean for a Statute of Limitations To Be Tolled?

A statute of limitations is said to be tolled when it is paused. This typically occurs when the only eligible claimant is a minor or otherwise lacks legal capacity. This scenario is most common in wrongful death cases. In these cases, the clock begins to run when the eligible party reaches legal age or when the legal incapacity is terminated.

In addition to tolling the statute of limitations, some jurisdictions waive the statute of limitations altogether in cases involving fraudulent concealment of harm by the defendant.

When Should I Contact an Asbestos Attorney?

It is important to contact an attorney as soon as possible after your diagnosis to ensure your attorney can build the strongest case possible. Some jurisdictions have laws not related to the statute of limitations that may be beneficial to your case, even if the statute of limitations is shorter.

When you hire The Lanier Law Firm, we immediately initiate an investigation into your job and personal history to uncover all sources of your exposure to asbestos. This requires the work of private investigators and consultants who can access documentation, both public and private. We will also spend substantial time with you to ensure we build a complete history.

These efforts take time. Our attorneys’ goal is to recover maximum compensation on your behalf. We are willing to search from coast to coast to find all the information necessary to accomplish this and even file lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions. Contacting us early will ensure we accomplish all of this while still having access to file in the venue or venues of choice.

Mesothelioma Statute of Limitations By State

State

Statute of Limitations – Personal Injury

Statute of Limitations – Product Liability

Statute of Limitations – Wrongful Death

2 years: Ala. Code § 6-2-38

2 years: Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l)

2 years: Ala. Code § 6-2-38(a)

2 years: Alaska Stat. § 09.10.070(a)

2 years: Alaska Stat. § 09.10.070

2 years: Alaska Stat. § 09.55.580

2 years: A. R. S. § 12-542

2 years: A. R. S. § 12-542

2 years: A. R. S. § 12-542

3 years: A.C.A. § 16-56-105(1)

3 years: A.C.A. § 16-116-203

3 years: A.C.A. § 16-62-102(c)(1)

1 year: C.C.P. § 340.2

1 year: C.C.P. § 340.2

1 year: C.C.P. § 340.2

2 years: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102

2 years: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-106

2 years: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102(1)(d)

2 years: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584

3 years: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-577a

2 years: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-555

2 years: 10 Del. C. § 8119

2 years: 10 Del. C. § 8107, § 8119

2 years: 10 Del. C. § 8107

2 years: Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4)(a)

2 years: Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4)

2 years: Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4)(e)

2 years: Ga. Code Ann. § 9-3-33

2 years: Ga. Code Ann. § 9-3-33

2 years: Ga. Code Ann. § 9-3-33

2 years: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-7 

2 years: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-7

2 years: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 663-3

2 years: Idaho Code § 5-219

2 years: Idaho Code §§ 5-219, 6-1403

2 years: Idaho Code § 5-219

2 years: 735 ILCS 5/13-202

2 years: 735 ILCS 5/13-213

2 years: 740 ILCS 180/2

2 years: Ind. Code Ann. § 34-11-2-4

2 years: Ind. Code Ann. § 34-20-3-1

2 years: Ind. Code Ann. § 34-23-1-1

2 years: Iowa Code §. 614.1(2)

15 years: Iowa Code §. 614.1(2) 

2 years: Iowa Code §. 614.1(2)

2 years: Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-513(a)(4)

2 years: Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-3303

2 years: Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-513(a)(5)

1 year: Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 413.140

5 years: Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 413.120

1 year: Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 413.140

2 years: La. Civ. Code Art. 3493.1

1 year: La. Civ. Code Art. 3492

1 year: La. Civ. Code Art. 2315.2

6 years: Me. Rev. Stat. Tit. 14, Ch. 205, § 752

6 years: Me. Rev. Stat. Tit. 14, Ch. 205, § 752

3 years: Me. Rev. Stat. Tit. 18-C § 2-807

3 years: Md. Courts & Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 5-101

3 years: Md. Courts & Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 5-101

3 years: Md. Courts & Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 3-904(g)(1)

3 years: Mass. Gen. Laws, Art. 260, § 2A

3 years: Mass. Gen. Laws, Art. 106, § 2-318

3 years: Mass. Gen. Laws, Art. 229, § 2

3 years: Mich. Comp Laws Sec. 600.5805

3 years: Mich. Comp Laws Sec. 600.5805(13)

3 years: Mich. Comp Laws Sec. 600.5805(10)

2 years: Minn. Stat. § 541.05, 541.07

4 years: Minn. Stat. § 541.05(b)(1)

3 years: Minn. Stat. § 573.02

3 years: Miss. Code § 15-1-49

3 years: Miss. Code § 15-1-49

3 years: Miss. Code § 15-1-49

5 years: Mo. Rev. Stat. Title 35, § 516.120

5 years: Mo. Rev. Stat. Title 35, § 516.120

3 years: Mo. Rev. Stat. Title 36, § 537.100 and 537.080

3 years: Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-204

3 years: Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-204

3 years: Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-204(2)

4 years: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207

4 years: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-224

2 years: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-810

2 years: N.R.S. § 11.190

4 years: N.R.S. § 11.220

2 years: N.R.S. § 11.190

3 years: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 508:4

3 years: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 508:4

6 years: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 556:11

2 years: N.J. Stat. § 2A:14-2

6 years: N.J. Stat. § 2A:14-1

2 years: N.J. Stat. § 2A:31-3

3 years: N.M. Stat. Ann. § 37-1-8

3 years: N.M. Stat. Ann. § 37-1-8

3 years: N.M. Stat. Ann. § 41-2-2

3 years: N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214

3 years: N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214

2 years: N.Y. EPTL § 5-4.1

3 years: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-52(16)

6 years: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-50(a)(6)

2 years: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-53(4)

6 years: N.D. Cent. Code § 28-01-16

6 years: N.D. Cent. Code § 28-01-16

2 years: N.D. Cent. Code § 28-01-18

2 years: Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10

2 years: Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10

2 years: Ohio Rev. Code § 2125.02

2 years: Okla. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12, § 95(3)

2 years: Okla. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12, § 95

2 years: Okla. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12, § 1053(A)

2 years: Or. Rev. Stat. § 12.110

2 years: Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.907

3 years: Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.020

2 years: 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524(2)

2 years: 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524(2)

2 years: 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524(2)

3 years: R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-14(b)

10 years: R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-13(a)

3 years: R.I. Gen. Laws § 10-7-2

3 years: S.C. Code § 15-3-530

3 years: S.C. Code § 15-3-530

3 years: S.C. Code § 15-3-530

3 years: S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 15-2-14

3 years: S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 15-2-12.2

3 years: S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 21-5-3

1 year: Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104

1 year: Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104

1 year: Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104

2 years: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003

15 years: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.012

2 years: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003

4 years: Utah Code § 78B-2-307

2 years: Utah Code § 78B-6-706

2 years: Utah Code § 78B-2-304

3 years: Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12, § 512

6 years: Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12, § 511

2 years: Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 14, § 1492

2 years: Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-243

2 years: Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-243

2 years: Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-244

3 years: Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 4.16.080

3 years: Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 7.72.060

3 years: Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 4.16.080

Washington, D.C.

3 years: DC Code § 12-301(3)

3 years: DC Code § 12-301(8)

2 years: DC Code § 16-2702

2 years: W. Va. Code § 55-2-12

2 years: W. Va. Code § 55-2-12

2 years: W. Va. Code § 55-7-6

3 years: Wisc. Stat. § 893.54

3 years: Wisc. Stat. § 893.54

3 years: Wisc. Stat. § 893.54

4 years: Wy. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)

4 years: Wy. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)

2 years: Wy. Stat. § 1-38-102(d)

What Are My Options if the Statute of Limitations Has Expired?

When a statute of limitations has expired, you are time-barred from filing a case in that jurisdiction. In this circumstance, you may be able to file your case in a jurisdiction that has a longer statute of limitations. However, you will need to establish grounds to file in that jurisdiction. You may be able to file in an alternate venue when you can establish the following:

  • You experienced exposure in that jurisdiction.
  • The headquarters of the corporation that exposed you to asbestos is located in that jurisdiction.
  • The liable party lives in the jurisdiction.
  • You can establish another relevant connection to that jurisdiction.

Our Results in a Case Involving 21 Time-Barred Steelworkers

The Lanier Law Firm is committed to finding the necessary grounds to move a case to the venue that serves the best interests of our clients. Our law firm was contacted by 21 steelworkers from Alabama who had contracted mesothelioma as a result of occupational exposure to asbestos.

The workers were unable to file a claim in Alabama, the state where the exposure occurred, because the statute of limitations had already expired. We successfully moved the venue to Texas, where we won a $115 million verdict on behalf of the steelworkers, one of the largest asbestos verdicts in U.S. history.

Contact The Lanier Law Firm Today

If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, the clock on the statute of limitations has already begun to run.
Contact The Lanier Law Firm today to start your case before time runs out.

Headshot of Lawrence P. Wilson, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury and product liability.
Lawrence P. Wilson

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Lawrence P. Wilson specializes in personal injury, product liability, medical malpractice, and certain maritime matters. He recently settled a $17.5 million personal injury case and secured a favorable verdict in Schwab v. Ford Motor Company. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2012-2021) and named to Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Lawyers.

Headshot of Alex Abston, Senior Attorney in Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability.
Alex Abston

Read Bio

Attorney
Alex Abston specializes in pharmaceutical liability, product liability, and mass torts. She was part of the trial team that obtained one of the first federal jury verdicts in MDL 2804, In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation. Honors include Lawdragon 500 Next Generation (2024) and Texas’ Top 40 Under 40 (2021-2024), among others.

Headshot of Alex Brown, Managing Attorney for the Lanier Law Firm Business Litigation practice.
Alex Brown

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Business Litigation
Alex Brown specializes in business litigation, handling complex disputes in federal, state, and international forums. He led trial teams to secure a $9 billion jury award in the Actos case. Recent honors include Best Lawyers (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2025), among others.

Headshot of attorney Benjamin T. Major from the Lanier Law Firm's Issues and Appeals legal team.
Benjamin T. Major

Read Bio

Attorney
Benjamin T. Major specializes in issues and appeals, helping preserve multi-billion dollar judgments and secure favorable settlements. Notable achievements include preserving a tort judgment for ovarian cancer victims and defeating motions in antitrust and false claims litigation. Recognized as a Texas Rising Star (2018-2020), among others.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Case A. Dam, part of the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Case A. Dam

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Case A. Dam specializes in asbestos exposure, representing clients with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and related cancers. He has served veterans, automotive mechanics, and workers in various industries. Recognized in the 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers, among others.

Headshot of Darron E. Berquist, Managing Attorney Asbestos Litigation for the Lanier Law Firm.
Darron E. Berquist

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Litigation
Darron E. Berquist specializes in asbestos exposure and product liability. He was part of the team that secured a $4.69 billion jury verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, linking asbestos in talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of David L. Rosenband, Senior Attorney practicing Personal Injury and Pharmaceutical and Product Liability.
David L. Rosenband

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
David L. Rosenband specializes in pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. He served as Liaison Counsel in the New York Bextra/Celebrex litigation and helped secure a $9 million verdict in the NJ Accutane case. Recognized for his work in MDLs and state court litigations.

Headshot of Evan M. Janush, Managing Attorney, New York, for Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical Liability, and Product Liability.
Evan M. Janush

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, New York
Evan M. Janush oversees the firm’s pharmaceutical and product liability mass tort litigation in New York. He served on the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in MDL 2804 and was part of the trial team in the Vioxx cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Judson A. Waltman is a Lanier Law Firm Managing Attorney for product liability, personal injury and maritime law.
Judson A. Waltman

Read Bio

Judson A. Waltman specializes in personal injury, product liability, and maritime law. He secured one of the largest verdicts in Ward County, Texas, for an injured oilfield worker and a $2 million verdict for a Central Texas worker. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Personal Injury and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of Kevin LaMarca, Senior Attorney in the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Kevin LaMarca

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Kevin LaMarca specializes in asbestos exposure, personal injury, and product liability. He secured multiple seven-figure settlements, including $2.25 million for a deceased papermill worker’s family. Recognized as a National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, Kevin represents clients across the country in both state and federal courts.

Headshot of Manny Cabrera, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney for the asbestos exposure and mesothelioma practice.
Manny Cabrera

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Manny Cabrera specializes in asbestos exposure and catastrophic injury cases. He has represented clients in asbestos-related matters and personal injury, as well as trucking and premises liability cases. Honored as a National Trial Lawyers Civil Plaintiff Top 40 Under 40.

Headshot of Maura Kolb, Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution in the mesothelioma and pharmaceutical liability practice.
Maura Kolb

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution
Maura Kolb leads the Asbestos Resolution Team, securing millions for clients annually. She was part of the team that won a $258 million Vioxx verdict and has coordinated BP Gulf Oil Spill settlements. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2024), Maura serves on several national asbestos trust advisory committees.

Headshot of Megan Waida, Senior Attorney in the Lanier Law Firm's Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Megan Waida

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Megan Waida specializes in asbestos exposure and appellate cases. Named to the National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 (2018-2021), Megan advocates for asbestos victims and has a strong background in complex litigation.

Headshot of Michael A. Akselrud, Senior Attorney in our Business Litigation, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Michael A. Akselrud

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michael A. Akselrud specializes in personal injury, business litigation, and product liability. He was part of the trial team that secured a $4.69 billion verdict in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder case. Recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star (2016) and named to LawDragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Michelle Greene, Senior Attorney in our Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability practice.
Michelle Greene

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michelle Greene specializes in pharmaceutical and product liability, with a focus on toxic torts. She represented clients in AFFF and PFAS contamination cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers as “”Ones to Watch”” (2024-2025) and listed in Lawdragon’s Next Generation (2025) for Plaintiff Litigation.

Headshot of Patrice McKinney, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury, product liability, and FELA.
Patrice McKinney

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Patrice McKinney specializes in personal injury, product liability, and FELA cases, with a focus on railroad workers injured on the job, car and trucking collisions, and oilfield injuries. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2017-2024) and Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Personal Injury.

Headshot of Rachel Lanier, Managing Attorney, Los Angeles, Product Liability and Pharmaceutical Liability
Rachel Lanier

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Los Angeles
Rachel Lanier specializes in pharmaceutical and product liability, helping secure the $4.6 billion verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson. Recognized by Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Mass Tort and Personal Injury, Rachel leads the firm’s social media addiction lawsuits and represents clients in high-profile MDLs.

Headshot of Rebecca Phillips, The Lanier Law Firm's Mass Torts Director.
Rebecca Phillips

Read Bio

Mass Torts Director
Rebecca Phillips specializes in pharmaceutical liability, business litigation, and appeals. Co-lead counsel in the Bard Implant litigation, she also helped secure billions in opioid recovery for Texas. Recent honors include Super Lawyers Rising Star and Lawdragon 500 (2024-2025), among others.

Headshot of Sam E. Taylor, Senior Litigation Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm Personal Injury practice.
Sam E. Taylor

Read Bio

Senior Litigation Counsel
Sam E. Taylor is board-certified in Personal Injury Trial Law and Civil Trial Law, with over 30 years of experience. He has tried over 50 civil jury trials, including mesothelioma and wrongful death cases. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer since 2008, Sam holds an AV Preeminent Rating for 25+ years.

Headshot of Zeke DeRose, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney, Business Litigation
Zeke DeRose

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Zeke DeRose specializes in business litigation, antitrust, and product liability. He is part of the legal team in an antitrust case against Google and represents the State of Arkansas in litigation against Meta. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2025) and Best Lawyers (2025), Zeke is a member of the National Trial Lawyers Top 100.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Catherine Heacox, part of the Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical and Product Liability practice.
Catherine Heacox

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Catherine Heacox specializes in pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. Recognized by Super Lawyers as New York Metro Super Lawyer since 2013, Catherine has extensive experience in MDL and mass tort litigation.

Headshot of attorney Richard D. Meadow who serves as Of Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm.
Richard Meadow

Read Bio

Of Counsel
Richard Meadow’s broad legal experience spans multiple practice areas and jurisdictions. He is recognized in Best Lawyers 2025 for his work in Mass Tort Litigation and Personal Injury Litigation. With over three decades of experience, Richard has dedicated his career to championing the rights of injured individuals.