Asbestos Laws and Regulations

Asbestos regulations are imposed by the EPA, OSHA, and state laws to minimize the release of asbestos fibers into the environment and protect public health. Large corporations have fought against regulation for nearly a century to continue profiting from this harmful substance.

Asbestos is a toxic environmental pollutant that poses a serious threat to public health. Surprisingly, asbestos is not entirely banned in the United States. Even if there were a ban, asbestos would continue to be a threat due to its widespread use throughout much of the 20th century.

Asbestos is hazardous to human health even with limited exposure. There is no safe level of asbestos exposure. Asbestos laws regulate asbestos-containing materials, which the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines as materials comprised of at least one percent asbestos.

Which Asbestos Products Are Still in Use?

The use of asbestos in the United States has declined markedly since the 1970s, when its dangers became widely known. It is primarily used today in diaphragms for the production of chlorine.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) acknowledges that asbestos is still commercially used in the following products:

  • Certain automobile brake pads and clutches
  • Corrugated sheeting
  • Imported cement pipe
  • Roofing materials
  • Vinyl flooring tiles

Contact Our Firm

Schedule a FREE Consultation or Call
800-723-3216

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
First Name(Required)
Last Name(Required)
Asbestos-containing break pads
Asbestos-containing Kentile flooring
Asbestos-containing Rutland furnance cement
Asbestos-containing friction tape

EPA Asbestos Regulations

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created in 1970 as a response to growing concerns regarding pollution and its harmful effects on the environment. The EPA bears most of the federal regulatory authority concerning environmental pollutants like asbestos. Since its creation, several landmark laws have been enacted to regulate the use of asbestos.

1970: The Clean Air Act

The Clean Air Act is a comprehensive set of regulations to control hazardous emissions, most notably the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), a program specifically established to regulate toxic air pollutants, also known as air toxins.

The Clean Air Act evolved over the years to expand its scope, with the last revision occurring in 1990.

1973: Asbestos NESHAP

Asbestos was one of the first toxins to be regulated under NESHAP. In 1973, the EPA adopted Asbestos NESHAP to minimize the release of asbestos fibers into the air.

1976: The Toxic Substances Control Act (TCSA)

The TCSA gives the EPA authority to regulate chemical substances, including asbestos. The EPA can require reporting, recordkeeping, and testing. It can also impose restrictions. The TCSA also regulates the manufacture, import, and disposal of toxic substances.

1980: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)

Also known as Superfund, CERCLA established a tax on the chemical and petroleum industries and provided broad federal authority over releasing hazardous substances. The taxes collected are allocated to a trust fund for cleaning up hazardous waste sites.

This law also established liability for releasing hazardous waste at cleanup sites and authorized short-term removals and long-term remedial action.

1986: The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)

AHERA established federal regulations requiring schools to perform asbestos inspections and take appropriate action when asbestos risks are identified. The act also requires schools to institute a management plan and take measures to abate asbestos that is deemed hazardous.

The law allows asbestos to remain in place unless it is disturbed, which is when it becomes a hazard.

1988: The Asbestos Information Act

The Asbestos Information Act requires those who manufacture or process asbestos to report it to the EPA and for the EPA to make the information public.

1989: Asbestos Ban and Phase Out Rule

The 1989 Asbestos Ban was made by the EPA, which banned a majority of asbestos-containing products. However, the asbestos industry fought hard against this ban. In 1991, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sided with the asbestos companies. It reversed most of it, undermining the EPA’s authority under the Toxic Substances Control Act and making it difficult for the EPA to ban any chemicals.

As a result of the ruling, the EPA was only allowed to ban new commercial uses that would begin after August 25, 1989 and the following asbestos-containing products:

  • Corrugated paper
  • Commercial paper
  • Specialty paper
  • Rollboard
  • Flooring felt

2016: The Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act

The EPA’s authority to regulate harmful air pollutants remained severely limited for approximately 25 years until the passage of the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act. The passage of this act re-establishes the EPA’s authority under the TCSA.

Under this act, the EPA is required to evaluate existing chemicals within enforceable deadlines and approve new chemicals before they can enter the marketplace. This provides the following benefits:

  • Increases public transparency about hazardous chemicals
  • Empowers the EPA to carry out these responsibilities
  • Provides funding, enabling the EPA to carry out these responsibilities

2019: EPA Final Rule on Asbestos

The EPA quickly capitalized on its newly established authority afforded by the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act and issued a final rule prohibiting all discontinued uses of asbestos from re-entering the marketplace without EPA review and approval.

In addition to the products banned in 1989, this rule also restricts the following asbestos-containing products:

  • Adhesives, sealants, and coatings
  • Cement products
  • Friction materials
  • Millboard
  • Pipeline wrap
  • Woven products
  • Other building materials

April 5, 2022: Proposed Final Rule Banning Asbestos

The EPA proposed a risk management rule under the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act that would ban chrysotile asbestos imports, manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, and commercial use in six categories of asbestos products:

  • Asbestos diaphragms used in the chlor-alkali industry
  • Sheet gaskets
  • Aftermarket auto brakes and linings
  • Oilfield brake blocks
  • Vehicle friction products
  • Other gaskets


The law would also update disposal and recordkeeping requirements to meet current regulatory standards. Chrysotile asbestos is used exclusively in the chlor-alkali industry.

March 18, 2024: Chrysotile Asbestos Banned in the U.S.

The EPA announced a final rule banning ongoing uses of chrysotile asbestos in the United States.

OSHA Regulations

OSHA regulates workplace safety and imposes asbestos-related standards in the workplace.

In 1971, OSHA set an emergency asbestos standard, establishing a maximum permissible exposure limit (PEL) of five fibers per cubic centimeter over an eight-hour weighted average work day, with a maximum PEL at any time of 10 fibers per centimeter.

In 1972, OSHA finalized the PEL. As more information about the dangers of asbestos came to light, the PEL was reduced over the years as follows:

  • 1976 – 2 fibers per cubic centimeter
  • 1986 – 0.2 fibers per cubic centimeter
  • 1994 – 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter

State Laws on Asbestos

State laws govern the inspection and removal of asbestos from residential dwellings and commercial buildings. These laws typically require building contractors of older buildings to inspect facilities at specified intervals and remove asbestos when inspections reveal that asbestos is creating a health hazard.

State laws also govern the licensing requirements and qualifications of businesses and individuals who inspect and remove asbestos. While the EPA regulates removal and disposal processes, individual state laws also may be passed to augment these requirements.

The proposed final rule, if approved, will essentially ban asbestos. Until now, asbestos has remained legal because large corporations that profit from asbestos have fought to keep it legal. This is because corporate executives think with their wallets.

The asbestos industry has an almost 100-year history of concealing the dangers of asbestos to avoid regulations and continue to profit. These corporations prevailed against the EPA after the 1989 asbestos ban, and they can be expected to continue their fight to profit from a product that kills thousands of people every year.

Headshot of Darron E. Berquist, Managing Attorney for the Asbestos Litigation section of the Lanier Law Firm.
Darron E. Berquist
Managing Attorney, Asbestos Litigation

Darron E. Berquist specializes in asbestos exposure and product liability. He was part of the team that secured a $4.69 billion jury verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, linking asbestos in talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of Lawrence P. Wilson, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury and product liability.
Lawrence P. Wilson

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Lawrence P. Wilson specializes in personal injury, product liability, medical malpractice, and certain maritime matters. He recently settled a $17.5 million personal injury case and secured a favorable verdict in Schwab v. Ford Motor Company. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2012-2021) and named to Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Lawyers.

Headshot of Alex Abston, Senior Attorney in Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability.
Alex Abston

Read Bio

Attorney
Alex Abston specializes in pharmaceutical liability, product liability, and mass torts. She was part of the trial team that obtained one of the first federal jury verdicts in MDL 2804, In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation. Honors include Lawdragon 500 Next Generation (2024) and Texas’ Top 40 Under 40 (2021-2024), among others.

Headshot of Alex Brown, Managing Attorney for the Lanier Law Firm Business Litigation practice.
Alex Brown

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Business Litigation
Alex Brown specializes in business litigation, handling complex disputes in federal, state, and international forums. He led trial teams to secure a $9 billion jury award in the Actos case. Recent honors include Best Lawyers (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2025), among others.

Headshot of attorney Benjamin T. Major from the Lanier Law Firm's Issues and Appeals legal team.
Benjamin T. Major

Read Bio

Attorney
Benjamin T. Major specializes in issues and appeals, helping preserve multi-billion dollar judgments and secure favorable settlements. Notable achievements include preserving a tort judgment for ovarian cancer victims and defeating motions in antitrust and false claims litigation. Recognized as a Texas Rising Star (2018-2020), among others.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Case A. Dam, part of the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Case A. Dam

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Case A. Dam specializes in asbestos exposure, representing clients with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and related cancers. He has served veterans, automotive mechanics, and workers in various industries. Recognized in the 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers, among others.

Headshot of Darron E. Berquist, Managing Attorney Asbestos Litigation for the Lanier Law Firm.
Darron E. Berquist

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Litigation
Darron E. Berquist specializes in asbestos exposure and product liability. He was part of the team that secured a $4.69 billion jury verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, linking asbestos in talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of David L. Rosenband, Senior Attorney practicing Personal Injury and Pharmaceutical and Product Liability.
David L. Rosenband

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
David L. Rosenband specializes in pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. He served as Liaison Counsel in the New York Bextra/Celebrex litigation and helped secure a $9 million verdict in the NJ Accutane case. Recognized for his work in MDLs and state court litigations.

Headshot of Evan M. Janush, Managing Attorney, New York, for Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical Liability, and Product Liability.
Evan M. Janush

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, New York
Evan M. Janush oversees the firm’s pharmaceutical and product liability mass tort litigation in New York. He served on the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in MDL 2804 and was part of the trial team in the Vioxx cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Judson A. Waltman is a Lanier Law Firm Managing Attorney for product liability, personal injury and maritime law.
Judson A. Waltman

Read Bio

Judson A. Waltman specializes in personal injury, product liability, and maritime law. He secured one of the largest verdicts in Ward County, Texas, for an injured oilfield worker and a $2 million verdict for a Central Texas worker. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Personal Injury and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of Kevin LaMarca, Senior Attorney in the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Kevin LaMarca

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Kevin LaMarca specializes in asbestos exposure, personal injury, and product liability. He secured multiple seven-figure settlements, including $2.25 million for a deceased papermill worker’s family. Recognized as a National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, Kevin represents clients across the country in both state and federal courts.

Headshot of Manny Cabrera, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney for the asbestos exposure and mesothelioma practice.
Manny Cabrera

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Manny Cabrera specializes in asbestos exposure and catastrophic injury cases. He has represented clients in asbestos-related matters and personal injury, as well as trucking and premises liability cases. Honored as a National Trial Lawyers Civil Plaintiff Top 40 Under 40.

Headshot of Maura Kolb, Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution in the mesothelioma and pharmaceutical liability practice.
Maura Kolb

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution
Maura Kolb leads the Asbestos Resolution Team, securing millions for clients annually. She was part of the team that won a $258 million Vioxx verdict and has coordinated BP Gulf Oil Spill settlements. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2024), Maura serves on several national asbestos trust advisory committees.

Headshot of Megan Waida, Senior Attorney in the Lanier Law Firm's Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Megan Waida

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Megan Waida specializes in asbestos exposure and appellate cases. Named to the National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 (2018-2021), Megan advocates for asbestos victims and has a strong background in complex litigation.

Headshot of Michael A. Akselrud, Senior Attorney in our Business Litigation, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Michael A. Akselrud

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michael A. Akselrud specializes in personal injury, business litigation, and product liability. He was part of the trial team that secured a $4.69 billion verdict in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder case. Recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star (2016) and named to LawDragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Michelle Greene, Senior Attorney in our Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability practice.
Michelle Greene

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michelle Greene specializes in pharmaceutical and product liability, with a focus on toxic torts. She represented clients in AFFF and PFAS contamination cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers as “”Ones to Watch”” (2024-2025) and listed in Lawdragon’s Next Generation (2025) for Plaintiff Litigation.

Headshot of Patrice McKinney, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury, product liability, and FELA.
Patrice McKinney

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Patrice McKinney specializes in personal injury, product liability, and FELA cases, with a focus on railroad workers injured on the job, car and trucking collisions, and oilfield injuries. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2017-2024) and Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Personal Injury.

Headshot of Rachel Lanier, Managing Attorney, Los Angeles, Product Liability and Pharmaceutical Liability
Rachel Lanier

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Los Angeles
Rachel Lanier specializes in pharmaceutical and product liability, helping secure the $4.6 billion verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson. Recognized by Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Mass Tort and Personal Injury, Rachel leads the firm’s social media addiction lawsuits and represents clients in high-profile MDLs.

Headshot of Rebecca Phillips, The Lanier Law Firm's Mass Torts Director.
Rebecca Phillips

Read Bio

Mass Torts Director
Rebecca Phillips specializes in pharmaceutical liability, business litigation, and appeals. Co-lead counsel in the Bard Implant litigation, she also helped secure billions in opioid recovery for Texas. Recent honors include Super Lawyers Rising Star and Lawdragon 500 (2024-2025), among others.

Headshot of Sam E. Taylor, Senior Litigation Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm Personal Injury practice.
Sam E. Taylor

Read Bio

Senior Litigation Counsel
Sam E. Taylor is board-certified in Personal Injury Trial Law and Civil Trial Law, with over 30 years of experience. He has tried over 50 civil jury trials, including mesothelioma and wrongful death cases. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer since 2008, Sam holds an AV Preeminent Rating for 25+ years.

Headshot of Zeke DeRose, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney, Business Litigation
Zeke DeRose

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Zeke DeRose specializes in business litigation, antitrust, and product liability. He is part of the legal team in an antitrust case against Google and represents the State of Arkansas in litigation against Meta. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2025) and Best Lawyers (2025), Zeke is a member of the National Trial Lawyers Top 100.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Catherine Heacox, part of the Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical and Product Liability practice.
Catherine Heacox

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Catherine Heacox specializes in pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. Recognized by Super Lawyers as New York Metro Super Lawyer since 2013, Catherine has extensive experience in MDL and mass tort litigation.

Headshot of attorney Richard D. Meadow who serves as Of Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm.
Richard Meadow

Read Bio

Of Counsel
Richard Meadow’s broad legal experience spans multiple practice areas and jurisdictions. He is recognized in Best Lawyers 2025 for his work in Mass Tort Litigation and Personal Injury Litigation. With over three decades of experience, Richard has dedicated his career to championing the rights of injured individuals.